Late at the Shenzhen Science and Technology Park, 26-year-old programmer Zhang Ruigang ended a video conference. On the other end of the screen, the company's CTO was excited to announce that it would introduce an AI code generation system, which is expected to improve development efficiency by 60%. At the end of the meeting, a message popped up in the chat box: "Please submit a list of optimization personnel by Friday." He looked at the brightly lit office buildings outside the window, and suddenly remembered the fate of Maike's father, who was about to be replaced by a smart harvester in his hometown, and was surprisingly similar under the gears of technological iteration.

1. The trap of efficiency worship: When the intelligent revolution becomes technological violence

In 2025, the global artificial intelligence industry exceeded US$2 trillion, which is a dazzling contrast to the data from the International Labor Organization: 73 countries are experiencing structural unemployment crisis, and 170 million workers are trapped in a "skill cliff" due to automation. On Wall Street, Goldman Sachs replaced 600 analysts with AI trading systems, and the system processed 400,000 financial news per second; in Dongguan, after the clothing factory introduced visual quality inspection robots, 3,000 female cloth inspectors received termination notices. Behind these cold numbers, the capital-driven intelligent revolution is sliding into the abyss of danger.

1. Business logic of killing chickens and retrieving eggs

The "alternative innovation" strategy of technology giants is essentially a gambling that maximizes short-term interests. A certain e-commerce platform replaced 8,000 manual seats with AI customer service, which saved 1.2 billion yuan of annual costs, but caused a 23% decrease in consumer satisfaction - the system cannot understand the emotions in the dialect, and cannot understand the trembling handwriting of the elderly's handwritten orders. This rough "cost reduction and efficiency enhancement" is just like the Lude movement in the 19th century that destroyed not only the loom, but also the human warmth in the early days of the Industrial Revolution.

2. Neglected alternative costs

Economists estimate that every industrial robot deployed will destroy 6.2 jobs, but companies have never listed the "human reset cost" in their financial reports. When Detroit auto workers transformed into drone programming failure rate reached 68%, and when Shanghai takeaway riders were sleeping on the streets due to the popularity of autonomous delivery vehicles, these social costs were ultimately borne by public finance and individual lives. Nobel Prize winner in Economics Stiglitz warned: "When the fruits of technological progress only flow to the capital side, the intelligent revolution will become the largest inequality manufacturing machine in the 21st century."

3. The depreciation crisis of human nature

The education system is mass-producing "AI-friendly" talents, but it systematically stifles the core human advantages such as creativity and empathy. The AI ​​interview system of a multinational company digitizes the micro-expression scores of job seekers, which makes it difficult for those who recover from depression to find a job; the advertisement for children's programming training class says "Avoid being eliminated by AI starts at the age of 6." Under this trend of alienation, Harari, the author of "A Brief History of Humanity", asked: "Are we cultivating AI drivers, or are we cultivating qualified feed for AI?"

---

2. Reconstruction of technical ethics: Let artificial intelligence serve human nature evolution

In Ruhr, Germany, workers who once lost their jobs due to coal mine closures are receiving government-funded "human-machine collaborative technicians". They learn to operate smart mining equipment, and at the same time they transformed 30 years of underground experience into safety warning algorithms - this "human capital upgrade" model has increased the reemployment rate in the region to 89%. This reveals another possibility: artificial intelligence should not be a tool to replace humans, but a lever to amplify human values.

1. Establish an "alternative compensation" mechanism

The European Union's "Ethics Charter on Artificial Intelligence" pioneered the concept of "job conversion coefficient", requiring that every job replaced by an enterprise, it requires 1.2 high-value new positions or equivalent training resources. After a French automobile company introduced welding robots, it transformed the workers of the original line into "craft inheritors", using their experience to train AI to identify the aesthetic standards of traditional hand-welding, and ultimately created a limited edition model with a premium of 30%.

2. Create a new continent of human-machine collaboration

The "ultra-old production line" of Japanese auto manufacturers provides inspiration: 78-year-old technician cooperates with a collaborative robot. The former judges the engine abnormal noise based on experience, while the latter adjusts the accuracy of millimeters. This combination reduces the product's failure rate by 40%, and further enables the master's "craftsman intuition" to data-based data into the company's core assets. In the medical field, AI diagnostic systems form a "double-blind verification" mechanism with doctors, which not only improves efficiency but also retains humanistic care. The practice of Mayo Clinic shows that doctors with AI assistance have extended the consultation time by 12% because they can use the energy saved to patients' psychological counseling.

3. Create a "value protection zone" exclusive to humans

Research by Boston Consulting shows that there are natural "AI barriers" in areas such as emotional labor, complex decision-making, and cultural innovation. After Vancouver Hospital introduced the AI ​​triage system, nurses were no longer busy filling out forms, but instead set up a "palmology care team" to hold the hands of dying patients more time; at Milan Design Week, human designers and AI launched "creative table tennis". The former selected and injected cultural metaphors from the 100,000 patterns generated by the algorithm to create a "digital baroque" style that shocked the industry. These cases prove that when humans are liberated from repeated labor, they can climb higher levels of the Maslow pyramid of demand.

3. Future territory development: Rebuilding a cultural oasis outside of technology

In the "Slow Technology Experience Hall" in Ginza, Tokyo, customers need to store electronic equipment, write letters with manual typewriters, and check accounts with mechanical calculator. This seemingly regressive behavior has attracted an average of 3,000 people to queue up every day. Director Yuko Yamada said: "We are not opposing technology, but helping people regain their 'out of control'." This indicates a new blue ocean in the intelligent era: creating a value space that cannot be touched by technology.

1. Develop "anti-intelligent" industry**

The British Handmade Pen Guild has increased its membership by 300% in recent years. They spent three years to make a quill, and each scratch mark was a declaration of resisting industrial replication; in Hangzhou, young people founded the "Paper Social Club", and members handwritten three letters a week to convey temperature using a physical mailbox. Although these industries do not create GDP miracles, they preserve the undigital spiritual genes for civilization.

2. Cultivate "soft skills" that AI cannot replace

The Swedish education department has included "empathy training" into a compulsory course in primary and secondary schools. Children understand the inner world of depression through drama classes; the National University of Singapore offers a "failure learning" course to teach students to obtain life wisdom beyond algorithmic logic from setbacks. These abilities will not appear in any programming manual, but are the real cornerstone of maintaining human civilization.

3. Build a "sacred space" in a technical restricted area

A temple in Kyoto prohibits the carrying of smart devices, and monks insist on using morning bells instead of smart speakers to report the time; Swiss legislation stipulates that every Sunday is "no AI day", and all smart assistants are closed on the same day to allow citizens to regain their ability to think independently. These institutionalized "technical fasting" retain the pure land of introspection and contemplation for mankind.

Conclusion: Civilization choice in the intelligent era

When Silicon Valley engineers developed general artificial intelligence in secret laboratories, the Yanomami people in the depths of the Amazon rainforest were still continuing civilization with oral epics. These two seemingly opposite worlds actually reveal the same truth: the ultimate mission of technology is not to create perfect tools, but to protect the dignity and warmth of human beings.

History will eventually prove that companies busy replacing cashiers with AI will be eliminated, and tea artists who teach robots to control the water temperature when making tea will gain eternal life. Because in this era when algorithms can simulate love and quantum computers can deconstruct poetry, only those imperfect, time-consuming, human traces with sweat stains and mistakes are our last fortress to fight alienation.

As the 20th-century philosopher Mumford predicted in "Technology and Civilization": "Really great technology is never a tool to conquer nature, but a mirror that helps human beings understand their own meanings more deeply." Standing at the crossroads of the intelligent revolution, what we need is not a worship of technology or a blind fear, but a reconstruction of such a consensus: making machines work smarter is to make people live more clumsy, enthusiastic, and more humane.