Why has an exam related to the future become a magnifying glass for imbalance in educational resources?

In April 2025, a notice from the Ministry of Education made millions of families sleepless all night: the college entrance examination will add new social hot topics such as artificial intelligence ethics and carbon neutrality. Famous schools in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou opened "Front-term Trend Training Camps" overnight, but the principal of a mountain middle school in Yunnan was worried about the only old computer in the county: "We don't even have enough physics textbooks, so what can we use to teach students AI?" This policy, which seems to promote education reform, is exposing the cruelty of Chinese education.

1. Interpretation of the new policy: "Future War" in the College Entrance Examination Paper

According to the Ministry of Education documents, there will be three major changes in the 2025 college entrance examination questions:

Artificial intelligence ethics: candidates are required to analyze the responsibility for AI face-changing and autonomous driving accidents;

Carbon neutrality path: design county economic emission reduction plans and calculate carbon sink trading returns;

Combination of science and technology and people's livelihood: such as "How to use big data to solve the problem of care for empty-nest elderly people in rural areas".

A key middle school in Beijing has opened a "hot dialysis course" and hired academician-level tutors to teach, with an hourly salary of up to 5,000 yuan. In sharp contrast, a chemistry teacher from a rural middle school in Gansu said helplessly: "I learn and sell it now. I just finished Baidu last night what is carbon footprint."

2. Urban-rural tear: The information gap is killing poor families and hope urban elites to "reduce dimensionality to strike" the "desperate reality" in remote areas

Shocking data:

3. Parents are furious: Fair college entrance examination is "killing fairness" Beijing Haidian mother vs Guangxi mountain village father

An education blogger flipped out a policy document during live broadcast and shouted: "What is the difference between letting children in the mountains compete with Haidian academic masters in information warfare and letting infantry fight against tanks?"

4. Experts debate: Education reform or class solidification? Supporters: Force education to align with reality opposition: aggravates structural injustice

More terrifying chain reaction:

5. The way to break the deadlock: How to avoid a child falling behind? Policy first aid kit technology empowers social awakening

"When children in Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou are discussing controllable nuclear fusion, please don't forget the classrooms that are not even stable in electric lights." As the Guangming Daily commented: "Education reform cannot climb on the shoulders of vulnerable groups, only fairness can be achieved by being fair It is the biggest improvement.”

Conclusion: This college entrance examination reform storm is like a double-edged sword, which not only cuts the iron curtain of exam-oriented education, but also pierces the abscess of imbalance in educational resources. When we write about the future of mankind on the test paper, we should probably answer this question first: Can the light of education illuminate every corner?

Voting at the end of the article:

✅ Support reform, education must keep pace with the times

❌ Oppose recklessness and fill the gap between urban and rural areas first

➖ Neutral, but it is recommended to set regional differentiated test questions

⚠️ Statement: All cases described in this article are from public reports, and some school information has been desensitized. Educational equity is related to the destiny of the country and requires everyone's attention and actions.